<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICM2010 — Spielman laudatio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gowers.wordpress.com/2010/08/22/icm2010-spielman-laudatio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gowers.wordpress.com/2010/08/22/icm2010-spielman-laudatio/</link>
	<description>Mathematics related discussions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Furber</title>
		<link>http://gowers.wordpress.com/2010/08/22/icm2010-spielman-laudatio/#comment-10179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Furber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowers.wordpress.com/?p=2004#comment-10179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is smoothed analysis the same as basically taking the worst case modulo sets of measure zero (at least in the case where such terminology applies), like how $L^{\infty}$ functions are &quot;essentially bounded&quot;? The terminology used to describe it always uses a more awkward description based on shrinking Gaussians.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is smoothed analysis the same as basically taking the worst case modulo sets of measure zero (at least in the case where such terminology applies), like how $L^{\infty}$ functions are &#8220;essentially bounded&#8221;? The terminology used to describe it always uses a more awkward description based on shrinking Gaussians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simplex is not complex (not very) &#171; Karela Fry</title>
		<link>http://gowers.wordpress.com/2010/08/22/icm2010-spielman-laudatio/#comment-9250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simplex is not complex (not very) &#171; Karela Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowers.wordpress.com/?p=2004#comment-9250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a comment &#187;  In his blog,Tim Gowers summarizes Gil Kalai&#8216;s talk at the ICM explaining the work by Daniel Spielman [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a comment &raquo;  In his blog,Tim Gowers summarizes Gil Kalai&#8216;s talk at the ICM explaining the work by Daniel Spielman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gowers</title>
		<link>http://gowers.wordpress.com/2010/08/22/icm2010-spielman-laudatio/#comment-9129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gowers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowers.wordpress.com/?p=2004#comment-9129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks -- I&#039;ve corrected it now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks &#8212; I&#8217;ve corrected it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MG</title>
		<link>http://gowers.wordpress.com/2010/08/22/icm2010-spielman-laudatio/#comment-9122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gowers.wordpress.com/?p=2004#comment-9122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That last coauthor is Shokrollahi, for some reason ACM has it truncated at http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=276756]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That last coauthor is Shokrollahi, for some reason ACM has it truncated at <a href="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=276756" rel="nofollow">http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=276756</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
